Safety prioritized amid wet-weather drama at Spa
Safety Takes Center Stage at Rain-Delayed Belgian Grand Prix
SPA-FRANCORCHAMPS, Belgium — Sunday’s Belgian Grand Prix was a stark reminder of the delicate balance between excitement and safety in Formula 1, as torrential rain and poor visibility triggered lengthy delays before the race finally commenced at one of motorsport's most iconic circuits.
Rain began falling during the pre-race grid preparation, intensifying to the point where standing water and spray compromised driver visibility. The formation lap proceeded behind the safety car, but feedback from drivers, including pole-sitter Lando Norris, highlighted the dangers. "I could barely see anything, and I can only imagine how bad it was for the cars further back," Norris said over the radio.
The FIA acted swiftly, sending the cars back to the pit lane and opting to delay the start until conditions improved. While some drivers, including reigning world champion Max Verstappen, were critical of the decision, advocating for an earlier start, the risk factor associated with Spa was undeniable. "Three o'clock ... straight away," Verstappen argued. "It wasn’t even raining that badly, and a couple of laps behind the safety car would have cleared the water."
Nearly 90 minutes passed before racing finally began, with Norris leading the pack in a rolling start. However, by the time conditions improved—prompting drivers to switch from wet tires to slicks within 11 laps—the damp drama many had hoped for at Spa had evaporated into a relatively straightforward affair.
Driver Reactions: Split Opinions on Wet Racing
Afterward, Verstappen lamented the missed opportunity for a classic wet-weather race, suggesting overly cautious decision-making had "ruined" the spectacle. Hamilton echoed the sentiment but noted the FIA was likely reacting to a controversial call at this month’s British Grand Prix, where a restart led to collisions in worsening rain. "The visibility was bad, but it wasn’t as bad as Silverstone," Hamilton said. "We did miss some extreme wet racing, which I think would’ve been nice."
Spa’s storied layout, particularly the Eau Rouge-Raidillon stretch noted for its blind crest and high speed, undoubtedly played a part in the FIA’s deliberation. Mercedes driver George Russell defended the safety-focused call: "At over 200 miles an hour out of Eau Rouge, you literally cannot see anything. You may as well have a blindfold on. It isn’t racing; it’s stupidity."
Tragic Context Adds to Emphasis on Safety
Concerns over Eau Rouge are further heightened by recent tragedies at this circuit. The broadcast included a poignant focus on the mother of Anthoine Hubert, who was killed during a Formula 2 accident at Spa in 2019 at that very section. Heavy rain at the track also contributed to the death of Dilano van 't Hoff in a junior category race earlier in 2023.
Ultimately, McLaren’s Lando Norris and Oscar Piastri comfortably secured a one-two finish, with little drama beyond a brief early charge by Hamilton. McLaren team principal Andrea Stella praised the FIA’s approach, saying, "Delaying the race allowed us to prioritize safety in wet conditions. The high speeds at Spa mean the spray is excessive, and visibility becomes a serious problem. Today, the FIA made the wise call."
Balancing Excitement and Safety
While the restrained pace and delayed start frustrated some fans and competitors, the decision highlighted the importance of mitigating risks at one of Formula 1’s most treacherous venues—a poignant reminder that racing thrills cannot come at the expense of safety.
Up Next
